Gartner Report Suggests XP-to-Windows-7 Move 'Won't Be Easy'
Of course, sometimes the signs can be confusing, as with this recent story at ChannelWeb: Gartner: XP To Windows Leap Won't Be Easy. From the headline, you'd think the story might involve further discussion of the report that Microsoft won't offer a direct upgrade path from XP to Windows 7. That in itself should encourage businesses to adopt Vista sooner rather than later, as it will greatly simplify the eventual move to Windows 7 while affording the current benefits of Vista. However, the story makes no mention of that fairly sizable obstacle. Instead, it seems to focus on timetables: Gartner expects Microsoft to release Windows 7 to manufacturing by September in order to give OEMs time to install it on new PCs in time for the holiday season. But most organizations will need between 12 and 18 months after Windows 7 ships to conduct application testing and other migration tasks, according to Gartner, which says they shouldn't expect to deploy Windows 7 in widespread fashion before the first half of 2011. Um, okay. And what to do in the meantime? The article doesn't say, and that's where the confusion sets in. It "won't be easy" to migrate from XP to Windows 7, and it'll be years before that's even an option for most organizations. But, "unlike Microsoft, which has been urging customers to migrate to Vista first before Windows 7, Gartner isn't beating the Vista drum." Oh, Gartner, you crazy, conflicted bunch of analysts. We went ahead and perused the actual report, and concluded that these are the key takeaways:
After you've digested all this, check our recent post, The Risks of Skipping Vista: A Recap. It's chock full of information that actually makes sense--unlike this ChannelWeb story. |


Comments (5)
After a motherboard failure, I couldn't activate XP (an OEM licence) on the rebuilt box. Calling MS and begging permission to use something I had paid for really annoyed me, so I loaded Linux as an experiment. Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice replaced IE, OE and MS Office.
That was a year ago.
Migrating from Windows XP to Linux was less traumatic than the WordPerfect to MS Word migration about fifteen years ago. I have more problems with file interchangeability between older and newer versions of MS Word than I do between Word and OpenOffice.
Posted by David Brown | April 3, 2009 3:13 AM
It's a fair point about activation, though given how much money is lost each year to piracy, we can understand the necessity. As for Linux, it's certainly a reasonable solution for tech-savvy users, but everyday office workers would require a ton of retraining -- something that's just not cost-effective for most businesses.
Plus, OpenOffice is all well and good, but not many enterprise apps are compatible with Linux.
Posted by Simplify PC Solutions Blog Team
| April 3, 2009 6:05 PM
About, "Is skipping Vista a good idea?" I think youe it's a good idea, because the vista was a failure. Windows 7 seems to me that it's the best right now.
Too bad that you cannot use xp softwares in w7 :(
Posted by Seo | April 26, 2009 3:48 AM
Actually, you can: Microsoft just announced plans for an "XP compatibility mode" for Windows 7. Kind of like you can get right now in Vista with virtualization software.
Posted by Simplify PC Solutions Blog Team
| April 27, 2009 10:29 PM
windows 7 it's far good then vista. just wait to have a final release :)
Posted by okazii | June 11, 2009 9:24 AM